The creators of the global Netflix phenomenon, Stranger Things, have opened up about one of the show's most discussed topics: the surprising survival rate of its core cast. Despite the series' high-stakes battles with creatures from the Upside Down, Matt and Ross Duffer are notably hesitant to kill off main characters, and they have a compelling narrative reason for this choice.
The Philosophy Behind the Character Shield
In a series known for its emotional punches and terrifying moments, the permanent death of an original main character remains a rare event. While the show has featured devastating losses, such as the deaths of supporting characters like Eddie Munson, Bob Newby, and Barb, the central group from season one has remained largely intact.
Speaking to The Independent, the Duffer brothers explained that their decision-making process goes far beyond a simple desire to shock the audience. They carefully consider the long-term repercussions of any character death on the overall story and the remaining characters. "We just always want to think ahead and not just do it to shock people or because people have a bloodlust, which they seem to have," they stated.
Case Studies: Hopper, Max, and a Hypothetical Mike
The creators provided specific examples to illustrate their point. They highlighted the fate of Chief Jim Hopper in season three, where his apparent death was later revealed to be a fake-out. Ross Duffer clarified that killing Hopper would have been a simple narrative choice, but it was the wrong one for his character arc. "We hadn't finished his story," Ross revealed, emphasising that they prioritise completing character journeys over cheap shock value.
Another key example is Max Mayfield, who was technically killed at the end of season four but whose story continues in season five. Matt Duffer pointed to Billy's death and its profound effect on Max as a model for how a death should meaningfully impact the narrative and other characters.
In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Matt used a hypothetical scenario to drive the point home. "This is a total hypothetical: You kill Mike," he said. "It just makes the show rather depressing and bleak, and it becomes entirely about that." He noted that even the deaths of supporting characters have lasting repercussions, which the writers strive to honour.
A Last-Minute Reprieve for a Fan Favourite
The brothers also shared a fascinating piece of series trivia that underscores how fluid their plans can be. Steve Harrington, now a beloved hero, was originally slated to be killed off in the first season. "That was close," Matt admitted. "We just fell in love with Joe Keery, but had we not liked Joe Keery, Steve would've been gone." This revelation confirms that the writers' attachment to their characters and the actors who portray them plays a significant role in their survival.
As fans eagerly await the final season, the Duffer brothers' comments suggest that while the threat of death will undoubtedly loom large in Stranger Things 5, any major losses will be carefully considered and serve a greater purpose in concluding the epic story of Hawkins, Indiana.
