Solihull Four-Bedroom Home Plan Rejected After Planning Appeal
Solihull new home plan rejected by inspector

Resident Power Prevails in Solihull Housing Dispute

A government planning inspector has decisively thrown out an appeal to construct a new four-bedroom home on a green space in Solihull, delivering a victory for local residents who fiercely opposed the development. The proposal for a two-storey, detached house on the corner of Whitefields Crescent had been met with a flood of objections from neighbours concerned about its impact on their area.

From Council Rejection to Government Appeal

The contentious application first came before Solihull Council's planning committee earlier this year. Despite council planning officers recommending approval, arguing the site was in an established residential area and would help meet the need for smaller dwellings, the committee was vocal in its opposition. Councillor Sardul Marwa criticised the plan as a "very poor excuse for this particular dwelling," highlighting issues with the sloped site. Councillor Heather Delaney echoed these concerns, stating she could not understand how the location was considered suitable.

The committee ultimately refused the outline permission in a decisive vote, with eight councillors voting against and only one in favour. Undeterred, the applicant, Neil Carpenter, took the matter to the government's Planning Inspectorate in an attempt to overturn the local decision.

Inspector's Verdict: An 'Incongruous Addition'

Planning Inspector Beth Astley-Serougi conducted a site visit in October before making her ruling to dismiss the appeal earlier this month. In her official decision report, she acknowledged the wider topography of the crescent but concluded that the proposed house would be sited beyond the clear building line established by neighbouring properties.

She wrote that the appeal scheme would result in "an incongruous addition" and cause "unacceptable harm to the overall character and appearance of the surrounding area." This final ruling upholds the council's original decision and validates the significant community opposition to the project. The full appeal details can be found on the Planning Inspectorate's website by searching for reference APP/Q4625/W/25/3370534.