Pay-Per-Mile EV Tax Sparks Backlash as Drivers Warn of Transition Slowdown
Pay-Per-Mile EV Tax Sparks Backlash from Drivers

Pay-Per-Mile EV Tax Sparks Backlash as Drivers Warn of Transition Slowdown

The government's announcement of pay-per-mile car taxes for electric vehicles, scheduled to launch in April 2028, has been met with significant criticism from motoring experts and drivers alike. Industry leaders argue that the policy sends the wrong signal at a critical time for the electric vehicle transition.

Survey Reveals Widespread Concern Among Drivers

New data from a study conducted by Electrifying.com and the AA reveals that 55 percent of UK drivers are now less likely to switch to a new or second-hand electric vehicle as a result of the proposed pay-per-mile taxes. This alarming statistic highlights the potential negative impact of the policy on consumer confidence.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed that from April 2028, electric car drivers will be charged 3p per mile, while hybrid vehicle owners will face a charge of 1.5p per mile. However, only 14 percent of respondents in the survey agreed with the statement that the overall running costs of an electric car are lower than those of petrol or diesel vehicles.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Industry Leaders Issue Stern Warning

Ginny Buckley, founder and CEO of Electrifying.com, described the survey data as a serious wake-up call for the Chancellor ahead of the launch of electric Vehicle Excise Duty (eVED). She expressed frustration with what she called confusing government decision-making around electric vehicles.

"Once again, we're seeing confusing Government decision-making around electric vehicles that raises questions rather than builds confidence among car buyers considering making the switch," Buckley stated. "As our survey shows, the proposed pay-per-mile tax sends the wrong signal at the wrong time. Instead of accelerating the EV transition, it risks slamming on the brakes."

Buckley emphasized the contradiction in government messaging, noting: "You cannot claim to support mass adoption while undermining it with the threat of additional taxation."

AA President Criticizes Mixed Messaging

Edmund King, President of the AA, echoed these concerns, highlighting the government's mixed messaging and the need for improved conditions to encourage drivers to switch to electric vehicles. He pointed out that while early adopters have already made the transition, mainstream motorists require more accurate information and incentives.

"The early adopters have already made the switch, but mainstream motorists need more accurate information to convince them," King explained. "Even with eVED, if they can charge at home, they will still be better off going electric. The EV transition is essential, but drivers still need the right incentives and information to make that leap of faith."

The criticism comes at a pivotal moment for the UK's electric vehicle market, with experts warning that the proposed tax changes could significantly hinder progress toward broader EV adoption.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration