Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Custody Experience: Mugshot, DNA, and One Phone Call
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former working royal, was reportedly treated like a "common criminal" during his 11-hour stay in custody on Thursday, according to emerging reports. The arrest occurred at 8am on his 66th birthday, marking a significant and dramatic event in his life.
Details of the Custody Procedures
During his time in custody, Andrew underwent standard police procedures that included:
- A mugshot photograph being taken for official records.
- DNA saliva swabs collected alongside fingerprinting.
- Being allowed only one phone call, which sources indicate was likely made to a top lawyer.
Despite not being handcuffed during transportation from Sandringham in Norfolk, Andrew was subjected to a medical examination to assess his mental and physical fitness for interview. This process underscores the routine nature of the treatment, regardless of his royal background.
Expert Commentary on the Arrest
Retired detective chief inspector Mick Neville provided insights into the custody experience, noting that if Andrew had been detained in a cell, standard protocols such as removing belts or ties to prevent self-harm would have applied. Neville suggested that, if facilities permitted, a more sensible approach might have been to leave him with his bodyguard in a private room until legal representation arrived.
He remarked on the "extraordinary fall from grace", highlighting the contrast between Andrew's royal status and the mundane realities of custody, such as microwaved food and basic amenities. Neville emphasized that every police officer swears an oath of allegiance to the Crown, making this arrest particularly notable as it involves the King's younger brother, who remains eighth in line to the throne.
Legal and Historical Context
This arrest could potentially lead to the unprecedented legal scenario of Rex vs Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, pitting brother against brother in a court of law. Neville drew a historical parallel, noting that nothing comparable has occurred since the execution of Charles I in 1649, underscoring the rarity and significance of this event.
Andrew was released at 7pm after his custody period. He has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office and has consistently denied any wrongdoing related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender.
Lack of Prior Notification
It is understood that neither the King nor Buckingham Palace was informed before the arrest on Thursday morning. However, the Home Secretary was alerted shortly before Andrew was taken into custody, indicating some level of governmental awareness without royal involvement.
This incident highlights the blending of royal protocol with standard legal procedures, raising questions about privilege and equality under the law in high-profile cases.
