New analysis has identified a Midlands city as one of England's worst areas for drink-driving offences. Stoke-on-Trent has been ranked eighth in a national list of drink-driving hotspots, highlighting a significant issue with alcohol-related motoring in the region.
How the Hotspots Were Ranked
The list, compiled by car insurance experts at MoneySuperMarket, is based on the average number of penalty points held by residents for alcohol-related driving offences. This method provides a clear picture of where convictions are most prevalent.
Data shows that residents in Stoke-on-Trent hold an average of 1.86 drink-driving related penalty points on their licences. However, experts caution that a high number of points could reflect not just local behaviour but also rigorous enforcement by Staffordshire Police.
The National Picture and a Changing Law
Topping the national list was Luton, named England's drink-driving capital with residents averaging a staggering 3.31 points. It was followed by Carlisle, Torquay, and Norwich.
This revelation coincides with a major government policy shift. Ministers have confirmed plans to cut the legal drink-drive limit in England next year as part of a wider road safety strategy.
The current limit of 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath will be slashed to 22 micrograms. This significant reduction aims to further deter drivers from consuming any alcohol before getting behind the wheel.
The Real Cost of a Drink-Driving Conviction
Alicia Hempsted, an expert from MoneySuperMarket, warned that the proposed limit change should serve as a stark reminder. "Even small amounts of alcohol can impair judgement while driving," she stated, advising people to plan for taxis or designated drivers.
Choosing not to drive after drinking is framed not just as a legal obligation but as a critical safety and moral responsibility. The financial fallout from a conviction is also severe.
Insurers view drink-driving offences as high-risk, which can lead to premiums rising dramatically or some providers refusing cover altogether, creating long-term economic hardship for offenders.
