Planning officials in Solihull have rejected a substantial and already-built extension to a house in Shirley, siding with neighbours who branded the development "excessive" and a "pig's breakfast".
Neighbourhood Objections Override Officer Recommendation
The application for the property on Ufton Close sought permission to keep a two-storey side and rear extension, a single-storey rear extension, a loft conversion, and a detached outbuilding. Despite Solihull Council planning officers recommending approval, arguing the scheme was acceptable in size and design, the authority was inundated with objections.
Fifteen formal objections were submitted, including from ward councillors Annette Mackenzie and council leader Karen Grinsell. The matter was decided at the planning committee meeting held on December 15 at the Civic Suite.
Committee Debate Highlights Sympathy and Planning Breach
During the public speaking session, Michael Bradley, representing neighbours, argued that allowing the "extensive over development" would undermine the planning process, noting that similar applications on the street had been refused before. He raised concerns the property had effectively become a six-bedroom dwelling with an outbuilding "the size of a bungalow".
The applicant, Salma Hussain, submitted a statement explaining the works were to accommodate her family, including two children with severe learning disabilities, funded partly by a disabled facilities grant. "Our only aim is to allow our children to live safely, securely and with dignity," the statement read.
However, committee members focused on the retrospective nature of the application and the development's impact. Councillor Sardul Marwa questioned why permission was not sought first, while Chairman Councillor Bob Grinsell criticised the outbuilding as inappropriate and raised parking concerns on the narrow close.
Councillor Dave Pinwell summed up the visual impact, stating: "The term 'pigs breakfast' comes to mind. It does not look visually appealing at all."
Vote Result and Next Steps for Homeowner
When the vote was taken, seven committee members voted against the proposal, with only one in favour and one abstention. The refusal means the homeowner now faces enforcement action from Solihull Council to rectify the unauthorised development.
The applicant retains the right to appeal the decision to the government's Planning Inspectorate. The case highlights the risks of carrying out major building work without first securing the necessary planning consents, even when personal circumstances are compelling.
